shimGo to the content of this page.
paua slice
te pūrongo oranga tangata 2004
Top slant
Ministry of Social Development.
Economic Standard of Living
shim
In This Section
bullet Market Income Per Person
bullet Income Inequality
bullet Population With Low Incomes
bullet Population With Low Living Standards
bullet Housing Affordability
bullet Household Crowding
cnr left top shim cnr right top
shim
Regional Comparison
Downloads
  • Economic Standard Of Living
    PDF - 102kb
    Word - 476kb
shim
cnr left bottom shim cnr right bottom

Population With Low Incomes

Definition

The proportion of the population in economic family units with equivalent income net of housing cost below three thresholds (low, medium, and high). The measures take account of incomes, housing costs and family size and are adjusted for inflation and taxes. The thresholds are 40 percent, 50 percent, and 60 percent of 1998 median equivalent net-of-housing-cost family incomes.

Relevance

Insufficient economic resources limit people's ability to participate and belong to their community and wider society and otherwise restrict their quality of life. Furthermore, a consistent finding across the literature on outcomes for children is that low family income in childhood, if it is long-lasting, is associated with negative outcomes, such as lower educational attainment and poor health.

Current Level And Trends

In the year to June 2001, 22.6 percent of the population were living below the 60 percent threshold, a slight increase on the proportion in the previous survey year to March 1998 (22.0 percent). On all three measures (low, medium, and high), the proportion of the population with low incomes increased sharply in the early 1990s, reached a peak in the mid-1990s, and declined over the latter half of the decade. However, in 2001, the proportion of the population below these thresholds was still substantially higher than it had been in 1988.

The increase in the proportion of the population with low incomes through the early 1990s is attributable to high rates of unemployment and declines in the level of social assistance. The recent improvement in this measure may likewise reflect more robust economic (and income) growth, and the steady decline in unemployment.

Figure EC3.1   Lines showing proportions of population with net-of-housing-cost incomes below thresholds, 1988-1998, 2001
Figure EC3.1 - Lines showing proportions of population with net-of-housing-cost incomes below thresholds.
Source: Derived from Statistics New Zealand's Household Economic Survey, 1988-2001, by the Ministry of Social Development

Population Group Differences

In 2001, 29.1 percent of dependent children were in economic family units below the 60 percent line (benchmarked to the 1998 median). This represents an increase from 27.5 percent in 1998 and is almost twice the proportion in 1988 (14.6 percent), but substantially below the peak of 36.4 percent in 1994. For people aged 15 years or over, females (21.8 percent) were a little more likely to be in low income households than males (19.5 percent) in 2001.

Economic families most likely to be living with low incomes are: families reliant on income-tested benefits, sole-parent families, families with at least one adult belonging to an ethnic group other than European, families in rented dwellings and families with dependent children. The situation improved for most of these family types between 1993 and 1998. However, for sole-parent families the proportion below the 60 percent benchmark line increased again between 1998 and 2001.

Table EC3.1   Proportion of population with net-of-housing-cost incomes below the 60 percent line (benchmarked to 1998 median), 1988, 1993, 1998, 2001

  1987-88 1992-93 1997-98 2000-01
Total population 12.7 26.7 22.0 22.6
Total dependent children 14.6 34.7 27.5 29.1
Children in sole-parent families 18.5 65.6 59.2 66.3
Children in two-parent families 13.8 27.5 18.5 19.7
Males (15 years & over) 11.9 23.3 19.6 19.5
Females (15 years & over) 12.2 24.9 20.8 21.8
Total economic families 14.0 28.0 23.2 23.2
Economic families
With one dependent child 11.5 30.1 25.2 26.5
With two dependent children 11.7 32.9 23.5 26.0
With three or more dependent children 18.6 40.8 30.7 32.7
Sole-parent families 17.4 62.5 51.9 59.4
Two-parent families 12.4 25.1 17.0 17.5
Economic families  
With any Maori adult 14.0 41.0 31.2 32.0
With any Pacific adult 24.4 48.9 44.3 40.0
With any 'Other' ethnic group adult 23.6 42.8 53.7 35.6
With any European/Pākehā adult 12.6 23.3 18.5 18.7
Economic families with main source of income
New Zealand Superannuation 7.0 8.4 9.9 6.5
Income-tested benefit 26.0 74.3 61.7 61.6
Housing tenure (households with one family unit)
Rented n.a 43.3 37.2 33.5
Owned with mortgage n.a 24.l3 15.3 17.1
Owned without mortgage n.a 4.9 3.7 5.6

Source: Derived from Statistics New Zealand Household Economic Survey, by the Ministry of Social Development

International Comparison

Based on a slightly different measure, 60 percent of median equivalent disposable household income in 1995, and not taking housing costs into account, 13.7 percent of New Zealand households were living below the low income threshold, compared with an OECD median for the mid 1990s of 14.3 percent. New Zealand ranked ninth out of 22 OECD countries.53 This represents a higher proportion of households with a low (relative) income than the majority of European countries but a lower proportion of households compared with Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States.

^ Top

shim
paua footer